Evaluation of Alternative Cultivators for Vegetable Production
Richard Smith, University of California, Davis

A field trial in the Salinas Valley compared a brush hoe cultivator (Bartchi Fobro Co., Switzerland) to conventional cultivators for weed control in cool-season vegetables. Seven on-farm trials showed the brush hoe cultivated closer to the seed row (2 7/8 inches versus 4 inches), resulting in comparable or better weed control. Under heavy weed infestations, the brush hoe saved over four hours of weeding/thinning time per acre. However, at lower weed densities (1.5–2.0 weeds per foot of row), time savings were inconsistent. The brush hoe operated at a slower speed (2.5–3 mph versus 4–5 mph) and needed an extra operator for accurate cultivation near the seedline. Therefore, while potentially beneficial for smaller operations with limited labor or high weed pressure, the brush hoe’s economic viability for large-scale vegetable production is questionable.
Region
Western
Topic
Weed Management
Category
Vegetables/Fruits
Date Range
2000 and earlier
Funding Amount
$9,665
Funding Year
1999Location
Salinas, California
Collaborators
Steve Fennimore, University of California, Davis
David Bunn, Crown Packing
Phil Foster, Phil Foster Ranches
Mike Thorp, Tanimura and Antle