Impacts of Diverse Agricultural Management Practices on Crop, Soil, and Environmental Indicators: A Meta-Analysis

Project Director: Madaline Young, Wageningen University

Project Overview

Given the diversity of global agricultural operations, management practices, and site-specific factors, it can be difficult for farmers to accurately predict on-farm outcomes to management changes. Meta-analysis serves as a powerful statistical tool for comparing diverse conditions/outcomes from multiple independent studies and can elucidate important trends and/or discrepancies between variables. In this study, 113 meta-analyses from around the globe were reviewed in order to assess broad impacts of crop management measures, soil and water measures, soil amendments, fertilizer use, and 4R (right source, rate, timing, and placement) fertilizer strategies on outcome metrics including crop yield, crop N and P, soil quality indicators, soil greenhouse gas emissions, and nutrient losses.

Farmer Takeaways

  • Site-specific factors (including climate zone, soil texture, soil pH, crop type, and N dose) can strongly impact agricultural outcome metrics.
  • Across several studies, biochar amendments increased soil organic carbon by 27%, improved crop yields by 8.3%, and reduced N2O emissions by 40%. 
  • Organic N fertilizers can increase soil organic carbon and reduce N leaching by as much as 43%, suggesting a slower release rate that may better align with a crop’s nutrient uptake requirements.
  • Across studies, organic N fertilization resulted in 5% lower crop yield compared to synthetic fertilizers.

Project Objectives and Approach

Conducting the Meta-Analysis

113 global agricultural meta-analyses were reviewed, each of which linked at least one of the following management practices with one outcome metric: 

Management Practices: Crop rotation; cover cropping; residue retention; irrigation; tillage; enhanced efficiency; biochar; organic, mineral, and combined organic-mineral fertilization; and 4R fertilization strategies (right source, rate, timing, and placement)

Outcome Metrics: Crop yield; crop N and P (content, uptake, and use efficiency); soil organic C, N, and P contents; soil compaction; soil emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide; and nutrient losses to water (N and P surplus or leaching)

Calculating Effect Sizes

Effect sizes were calculated and reported as percentages of change from baseline or control values, with negative values indicating a decrease in an outcome metric due to a specific management practice, and positive values indicating an increase.

Estimating Impacts of Site-Specific Factors

Several site-specific factors including climate zone, soil texture, soil pH, crop type, N dose, and experimental duration, were assessed to determine the degree of sensitivity/interrelatedness of agricultural outcomes to site-specific factors. 

Key Findings

Crop rotation and cover cropping can increase N uptake and C/N sequestration in soil, thereby reducing N2O emissions and N surplus

  • Clear positive effects were observed for crop N in systems with cover cropping (+19%) and crop rotation (+11%). This could be attributed to the use of nitrogen-fixing legumes as cover crops and the preservation of soil N via timed plantings of N-intensive crops.
  • Reductions in N2O emissions were observed for both management practices (-5% and -4%, respectively), suggesting a reduction in denitrification and increase in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).

4R strategies and enhanced efficiency fertilizers can increase crop yield and crop N while reducing CO2, N2O, and NH3 emissions

  • The use of enhanced efficiency fertilizers (including urease inhibitors, controlled release, and nitrification inhibitors) resulted in a 5.7% mean increase in crop yield and a 14% increase in crop N, indicating that these fertilizers are effective at providing crops with essential nutrients during important stages of growth. 
  • Nitrification inhibitors may reduce N2O emissions by delaying nitrification until the crop has grown enough to absorb more nitrate, therefore increasing NUE and reducing denitrification. 
  • Urease inhibitors and controlled-release fertilizers may reduce NH3 emissions by reducing overall soil ammonium concentrations.

Applying biochar has the potential to improve SOC and crop yields, while simultaneously reducing N2O emissions and N leaching in the short-term

  • Biochar amendments increased soil organic carbon by 27%, improved crop yields by 8.3%, and reduced N2O emissions by 40%. 
  • The observed stimulation in crop yield could be attributed to several factors, including biochar’s positive interactions with soil pH and cation exchange capacity. 
  • Additional studies are needed in order to assess the long-term effects of biochar application. 

Organic N fertilizers can gradually build SOC and reduce N leaching, but may result in slight yield reductions and increases in N2O and CO2 emissions compared to soluble N fertilizers

  • SOC may increase by ~1% per year under organic N fertilization, while N leaching may be reduced by as much as 43%, suggesting that the decomposition rate of organic N sources may better coincide with a crop’s ability to utilize available nutrients throughout the growing season. 
  • Organic N fertilization may result in a slight decrease in overall crop yield (5%) and increase in both N2O (23%) and CO2 emissions (36%). These increases in emissions may be attributed to enhanced soil microbial activity.

Resources

Madaline D. Young, Gerard H. Ros, Wim de Vries, Impacts of agronomic measures on crop, soil, and environmental indicators: A review and synthesis of meta-analysis, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Volume 319, 2021

Read More

Location

Wageningen, Netherlands

Collaborators

Gerard Ros, Wageningen University

Wim de Vries, Wageningen University

Region

North Central, Northeast, Southern, Western

Topic

Soil Health, Crop Nutrient Management, Cropping Systems

Year Published

2021